Topic on User talk:Harakoni

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
Re: Raid points, taking recent as since the 19th of Feb. The edits are pretty much perfect. The only issue I have is that the "1 pawn point is worth x storyteller wealth" might get confused as a true equality, where it adds to storyteller wealth directly. This should be understood by people reading the whole page, but its a pretty convoluted topic, and people might skip sections. Basically just idiot/newb proofing. I'd probably reword it to something like "Given (threshholds/pawn count etc), pawn points increases by 1 for every increase of x in storyteller wealth". I know its not something you started, its used elsewhere on the page but it is something I'd fix.  
 
Re: Raid points, taking recent as since the 19th of Feb. The edits are pretty much perfect. The only issue I have is that the "1 pawn point is worth x storyteller wealth" might get confused as a true equality, where it adds to storyteller wealth directly. This should be understood by people reading the whole page, but its a pretty convoluted topic, and people might skip sections. Basically just idiot/newb proofing. I'd probably reword it to something like "Given (threshholds/pawn count etc), pawn points increases by 1 for every increase of x in storyteller wealth". I know its not something you started, its used elsewhere on the page but it is something I'd fix.  
  
TEMP SAVE WHILE I READ THE OTHER TWO.
+
 
 +
Re: Wealth, taking recent as since 17 of January. No issues with those edits themselves, though the page does overlap significantly with the other two. The examples might be best on Wealth Management, the raid points are largely duplications of parts of Raid Points. Duplicates like that make it harder to maintain and keep everything consistent (For example: [[Genes]] gets updated but the xenotype pages listing gene details don't - one reason I'm considering making their lists more like [[Hussars]] or template-izing them). It might be better to treat the page as a sort of "big disambiguation" or summary and primarily link to the relevant sections. But honestly thats just nitpicking.
 +
 
 +
TEMP SAVE WHILE I READ THE LAST ONE.