Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sculptures"

From RimWorld Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(This page's "Market Value" and all attendant analyses are wrong.)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
This page, including its attendant analyses, should be rewritten so that it is not inaccurate.
 
This page, including its attendant analyses, should be rewritten so that it is not inaccurate.
 +
 +
: Thanks for reporting the issue. You're more than welcome to take a stab at fixing it . If not, I'll have a go when I next get time.
 +
: PS you can sign your posts with 4 ~'s like this: <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>in a row, even without an account. - [[User:Harakoni|Harakoni (Wiki Moderator)]] ([[User talk:Harakoni|talk]]) 11:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:14, 28 October 2023

The material table's market value is wrong. The material isn't considered at all except as it modifies other stats. The values under Market Value are correct.

Take a poor wooden statue. The game lists it as having 79 value. This page suggests it market value should be 160 * 1.2 * 0.75 = 144. This is wrong. The formula on Market Value suggests it should have (1.2*50+300*0.7*60*0.0036)*0.75*1 = 79.02 value, which is dead on.

I'm not familiar with the history of Rimworld, but it seems to me perhaps the material value stat is a holdover from an older version of the game?

This page, including its attendant analyses, should be rewritten so that it is not inaccurate.

Thanks for reporting the issue. You're more than welcome to take a stab at fixing it . If not, I'll have a go when I next get time.
PS you can sign your posts with 4 ~'s like this: ~~~~in a row, even without an account. - Harakoni (Wiki Moderator) (talk) 11:14, 28 October 2023 (UTC)