Topic on Talk:Pack animal
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a permanent link to a single version of this post.
This version is from 10:58, 23 December 2022.
You can see the differences from the previous version, or view other versions on the post history page.
Opening this up again (technically this was never closed)
- Least shock - if it is a "pack animal", i expect animals first.
- I find little potential reason to compare mechs and animals on the same table. Mechs don't use food/power but use bandwidth.
- If a player wanted to compare mech v animals, then it is still possible to compare in a split table. The utility of same-table comparison, I assert, is pretty low. Tiered sorting is possible, but wiki is clunky.
- It is possible to compromise and put everything on the same table
- Having seperate subsections can mean more explanation of the cost of mechs (bandwidth + you lose out on a worker/combatant)
- Having columns for food + bandwidth means a giant table, which is hard to look at