Topic on Talk:Impids

Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Harakoni in the topic "Using standardized sections for Xenotypes" on Talk:Impids. You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Re: Acquisition. Ultimately the page standard is a guideline only - it can't and won't be fully applicable in every case, and in some cases won't apply at all. Generally we try to keep broad categories consistent instead. So every weapon will roughly have the same sections as the other weapons, and every faction will roughly have the same sections as the other factions, they're a different standard to each other.
 
Re: Acquisition. Ultimately the page standard is a guideline only - it can't and won't be fully applicable in every case, and in some cases won't apply at all. Generally we try to keep broad categories consistent instead. So every weapon will roughly have the same sections as the other weapons, and every faction will roughly have the same sections as the other factions, they're a different standard to each other.
 +
 +
I don't disagree that acquisition feels a little weird, but imo more importantly its limited in scope - you likely want to discuss ''incidence'' not just acquisition, so how often they show up in factions, as raiders etc. instead of just how you, the player, acquire them. That in mind, you're more than welcome to work out a standard and apply it the the pages. Hell, that goes generally. If you want to make a change that you think will improve the wiki, do it.
  
 
EDIT: to be clear you also want to talk about how you get them, but just not ONLY that.  
 
EDIT: to be clear you also want to talk about how you get them, but just not ONLY that.  
−
 
−
I don't disagree that acquisition feels a little weird, but imo more importantly its limited in scope - you likely want to discuss ''incidence'' not just acquisition, so how often they show up in factions, as raiders etc. instead of just how you, the player, acquire them. That in mind, you're more than welcome to work out a standard and apply it the the pages. Hell, that goes generally. If you want to make a change that you think will improve the wiki, do it.
 
  
 
------------------------------
 
------------------------------
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Re Genes. You can link directly to the relevant genes like this <nowiki>[[Genes#Fire_spew|Fire spew]]</nowiki> which results in [[Genes#Fire_spew|Fire spew]] and should take you direct to the relevant row of the relevant table. Personally I wouldn't replicate the table itself on the other pages just because long term it means having to ensure both are updated concurrently, but if you think it'll improve the pages, do so. Thats my opinion as an editor only.  
 
Re Genes. You can link directly to the relevant genes like this <nowiki>[[Genes#Fire_spew|Fire spew]]</nowiki> which results in [[Genes#Fire_spew|Fire spew]] and should take you direct to the relevant row of the relevant table. Personally I wouldn't replicate the table itself on the other pages just because long term it means having to ensure both are updated concurrently, but if you think it'll improve the pages, do so. Thats my opinion as an editor only.  
  
−
Also which standard did I change? I didn't add inheritance - idek if it makes sense as a table column. Did I step on someones toes without realizing it?
+
Also which layout did I change? I didn't add inheritance - idek if it makes sense as a table column. Did I step on someones toes without realizing it?
Retrieved from "https://rimworldwiki.com/wiki/Topic:X5nncw0kn2io98ct"