Topic on Talk:Colony Building Guide

"I have been avoiding looking into messages because it might be another flaming discussion made by him."

You are wrong. Communication is essential in any group, and discussions are the place where final decisions are made.

• You wanted to report me. Then, when Zesty showed-up, you didn't use your chance to properly address "your" problems. Things don't get solved by mere wishes.

The facts are that:

• You broke Policy by making "Major Changes" without proposing a Draft nor opening a discussion as to why a page needs a revamp... BEFORE removing large portions of contents. You broke the Law.
• You broke Policy repeatedly by engaged into multiple Reverts Wikipedia:Edit Warring & Three revert rule
• You proceeded to do as will regardless of domestic laws, carelessly.
• When you broke the Laws in this Community, the "Police officer" came to tell you which infractions did you commit and why your behavior is unacceptable. And instead of listening to the Authority, you insulted instead, kept behaving uncivil and even tried to tell the officer about the laws like if he didn't knew what all is about: WARNING: User Yoshida Keiji disruptive editing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Disruptive_editing * Accounts used primarily for disruption may be blocked indefinitely.
• So you were now sent to "Court", there, now you pretend to impose your own convenient Laws regardless of the existing ones and even want to decide your own sentence. You still want to do whatever you want, regardless of rules, careless about the others and even make others do as you want.

There is no way you are getting off with this.

When you make statements, you would do well to choose your wording and don't come up with terms such as "apparently" because it connotes that you are uncertain and don't have the proper proof to back up your case.

You went to "Update" the other guides without Proposing a Draft or opening a proper discussion. This means that you literally "run-over" the rest of the Community members without a care of everybody else's opinion. And while you were breaking the Rules, you never considered the others. The Laws apply to all, and you are NOT above it. The Law also protects YOU. But in your current state you are probably to blind to see it. Someday in the future, another person may come and want to do exactly as you are doing now. Then, what is going to protect "your guides" from being "blanked away" or even "deleted by will"... well it"s exactly the same LAW that we are talking about now. I will be the officer that will stand between the "new offender" and YOU. And if you still think none of this matters, nothing that you have done will remain after the "next guy" comes and says your articles suck.

You are NOT the law, therefore, it is NOT up to you to make Community-wide decisions on the run and implement them as convenient. I told you before: "-When in Rome, do as the Romans.-" You broke the Law repeatedly, and you are not going to run away with it.

Every Major Change intended for an article needs to be "DISCUSSED", so...

"I tried to explain to him many times that his guides are outdated and instead of removing some else attempt to update the guide he should instead edit the parts about the guide that he doesnt like."

...this means that:

1. First, you must open a Discussion,
2. Second, await for responses and continue the Dialogue until a final conclusion is met,
3. Third, then make the changes.

But you never did this. This is why you are an Outlaw. You never introduced a "Draft" to the Community. Which is why we can charge you for breaking "Policy-Procedures". The Draft, is what needs to be evaluated under "Conceptual-Content" by the entire Community and only then if approved, sees the light. But instead, you "Forced it upon the Community". There is NO-WAY that you can claim any Wikipedia:Assume good faith. You lost your "nimbus".

And yes, before I forget, you ARE childish, the whole world can see how you attempt to close discussions that don't favor you by marking topics as resolved although they are still active, and you only re-open them when convenient for you to add another reply, then try to remove others chances to give their own opinions. To later on, even attempt to make a summary... that it doesn't even summarize the content of the topic, but instead write something else. You are, officially, childish. Because we can all see, that removing the table is just your pathetic attempt to hit on me.

You have been twisting my words, making false accusations like for example: that I deleted content and when I expose the Special:Log/delete page you don't detract your words.

We are going to enter "Restoration Phase" now, and the slightest misdeed you do next will get you a ban. We have been dealing with your shit for half a year now and no more.

Yoshida Keiji(Let's talk)

07:39, 20 January 2019 (UTC)