Editing Talk:ThingDef/.xml notation "attributes" are actually elements
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So to avoid confusion, and since we are dealing with .xml. I think we should use the proper nomenclature and refer to .xml elements as "elements" instead of as "attributes". There are also actual attributes used in the .xml definition files (eg: parentClass). I think it will make modding more approachable for those who have a background in .xml and html. I'm editing the page to reflect this but wanted to explain the reason here so that it didn't seem like I was just being arbitrary. | So to avoid confusion, and since we are dealing with .xml. I think we should use the proper nomenclature and refer to .xml elements as "elements" instead of as "attributes". There are also actual attributes used in the .xml definition files (eg: parentClass). I think it will make modding more approachable for those who have a background in .xml and html. I'm editing the page to reflect this but wanted to explain the reason here so that it didn't seem like I was just being arbitrary. | ||
− | |||
− |