Topic on Talk:Pack animal

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
 
** If a player wanted to compare mech v animals, then it is still ''possible'' to compare in a split table. The utility of same-table comparison, I assert, is pretty low. Tiered sorting is ''possible'', but wiki is clunky.
 
** If a player wanted to compare mech v animals, then it is still ''possible'' to compare in a split table. The utility of same-table comparison, I assert, is pretty low. Tiered sorting is ''possible'', but wiki is clunky.
 
** It is possible to compromise and put everything on the same table
 
** It is possible to compromise and put everything on the same table
* Right now the sorting has non-DLC mechs interspersed with the animals by default. This could presumably be fixed, but worth noting ATM
 
 
* Having seperate subsections can mean more explanation of the cost of mechs (bandwidth + you lose out on a worker/combatant)
 
* Having seperate subsections can mean more explanation of the cost of mechs (bandwidth + you lose out on a worker/combatant)
 
*Having columns for food + bandwidth means a giant table, which is hard to look at
 
*Having columns for food + bandwidth means a giant table, which is hard to look at