Topic on Talk:Plague
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page shows the changes between two versions of a post by Harakoni in the topic "Section Organising" on Talk:Plague.
You can see other versions of this post at its history page.
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
# Subheadings like "Minor - Severity: 0 - 0.59" are messy in the ToC, annoying to link to from other pages and don't always play nice with link sharing. It would be better to have it the subheading be "Minor" and the severity information in the body below, likely above and not part of the bulletpoint lists. | # Subheadings like "Minor - Severity: 0 - 0.59" are messy in the ToC, annoying to link to from other pages and don't always play nice with link sharing. It would be better to have it the subheading be "Minor" and the severity information in the body below, likely above and not part of the bulletpoint lists. | ||
# There should probably be at least some explanation of the two Extremes beyond just the headings. A new player might not understand that they're both shown as "Extreme" but are two different stages, or might not understand that it shouldn't show up as Extreme (initial), or might just think that the wiki is wrong because it doesn't appear to reflect whats in game. | # There should probably be at least some explanation of the two Extremes beyond just the headings. A new player might not understand that they're both shown as "Extreme" but are two different stages, or might not understand that it shouldn't show up as Extreme (initial), or might just think that the wiki is wrong because it doesn't appear to reflect whats in game. | ||
| + | # It might also be best to separate out the editorialize sections from the facts in treatment - e.g. | ||
| + | ::This disease can be cured by | ||
| + | ::*Biosculpt | ||
| + | ::*Luci | ||
| + | ::*Operation | ||
| + | ::*Natural immunity gain | ||
| + | ::<Insert analysis of how long natural immunity gain takes to cure, and who needs to use other methods to survive here> | ||
| + | : This keeps all the information clearly accessible and you don't have to read through analysis to get to basic facts. | ||
Happy to hear thoughts/debate/disagreement on the above. But otherwise, its excellent. | Happy to hear thoughts/debate/disagreement on the above. But otherwise, its excellent. | ||